|
No doubt for many small-business owners and their
families, the most far-reaching aspect of the new act is the gradual
lowering of the estate tax rates, the increase in the exemption amount and
the eventual repeal of estate taxes. Starting in 2002, estates valued at $1
million or less won’t face federal estate taxes, and the top estate-tax
rate for assets above that exemption amount will drop from the current high
of 55 percent to 50 percent. The $1 million exemption amount gradually
rises to $3.5 million by 2009, while the top tax rate gradually declines to
45 percent. Because of the higher exclusion rates, Congress also
eliminated, starting in 2003, the much-criticized deduction for qualified
family-owned business interests.
These changes should make it easier and less expensive
for owners to pass their businesses on to family members. However, there is
already much debate as to whether Congress will modify the tax rates and
exclusions between now and 2010, when full repeal of the estate tax is
scheduled to occur. Even more worrisome for many is that the full repeal is
scheduled to end a year later, in 2011, at which point the estate-tax
system would revert to its current form unless Congress acts between now
and then.
Beyond the estate tax provisions, several other
changes affect small-business owners. One major area involves retirement
plans. Contribution maximums by employees and owners to employer-sponsored
defined contribution plans such as 401(k)s, 403(b)s and simplified employee
pension (SEP) plans gradually increase to $15,000 in 2006. After that,
maximums will be adjusted for inflation in $500 increments. Maximum annual
SIMPLE plan contributions will rise to $10,000 by 2006. (Plan
discrimination testing may still preclude higher-paid employees from
contributing the maximum.)
Congress also raised the cap on the total employer and
employee contributions to a plan to100 percent of pay or $40,000, whichever
is smaller. Employers also will be able to deduct more for contributions to
their employees’ retirement plan, for both defined benefit and defined
contribution plans. This not only should encourage greater contributions
that help employees, but should increase funding for plans for owners such
as those in a partnership.
Furthermore, to encourage small businesses to
establish retirement plans for their owners and employees, the act allows a
tax credit of up to 50 percent of start-up costs or maintenance costs for
the first three years of a new plan started in 2002 or later. The dollar
limit for the credit is $500. To qualify, the business must employ 100
employees or fewer, and not have had a qualified retirement plan during the
previous three years.
Perhaps on the downside for business owners, the act
allows workers to claim the right to their employer’s matching
contributions faster than before. Cliff vesting is shortened to three years
and graduated vesting to six years. This may make it more difficult for
employers to retain workers who can now leave sooner with their
employer’s contributions in hand.
The act also provides new incentives for business
owners to establish or maintain day care for their employees. Starting in
2002, businesses can take a 25 percent tax credit for direct qualified
child care expenses, and an additional 10 percent for qualified child care
resources and referral expenses. The total dollar amount of credit that can
be claimed is $150,000.
Congress made permanent the law that employers (though
not closely held businesses) can deduct the cost of educational assistance
to employees (up to $5,250), and extended that deduction to assistance for
graduate courses. The act also makes permanent a worker’s ability to
exclude from personal income assistance an employer provides for adoption
expenses, and raised the amount of the exclusion to $10,000.
Other
aspects of the tax act also may have a more indirect impact on
small-business owners. For example, the gradual reduction in the personal
income tax rates may prompt some C corporations, whose top rate is 38
percent, to consider reorganizing as partnerships, sole proprietorships or
S corporations to take advantage of the lower rates, though nontax issues
such as liability and benefit deductions should also be considered before
changing.
E-mail this story to a friend
August 2001 — This column is produced by the Financial Planning Association, the
membership organization for the financial planning community.
|