RETURN TO HOME PAGE

 

The current economic downturn that has been erasing jobs as fast as it erases points off the Dow was created in large part by an excess of leverage.  Individuals, companies, and governments spent far beyond their means, facilitated by easy borrowing from the Chinese (in the case of government) or by pulling money from the ever expanding equity in their homes (in the case of individuals).  We're now in what is likely to be an extended period of "deleveraging" during which individuals, businesses, and governement will need to rebuild balance sheets.  For the moment, government is doing just the opposite in an attempt to make up for the fall in demand by the other two groups, but even governments will eventually be required to pull in their horns and deal with ballooning debt. This could very well lead to weak growth even after the economy bottoms out, a scenario some call "extended malaise." 

 

Guy Cumbie, a good friend and colleague, shared his exploration of this scenario with us over the weekend.  He harkened back to the last time we experienced a period of extended malaise and examined what the implications had been for stock market investments.

 

The Dow Jones Industrial Average was at 1,000 in 1965 and was at 1,000 again in 1981.  It goes without saying that the economic challenges during that period were the most extreme that had been seen since the 1930s, and included a major war, massive government deficits, two oil shocks, inflation, and flat economic growth (the last two of which combined to form the dreaded "stagflation").  Whether or not the current period will prove to be as challenging is yet to be seen. With dividends included, however, the average annual rate of return to the Dow over that 17 years was 5.22%. Over the same period, the S&P 500 had an annual average total return of 6.82%. The Investment Company of America Fund, a conservative, open-end mutual fund that was investing in a somewhat wider universe than either of the indexes had an annual average rate of return of 9.47%.   A portfolio that included small company, value, and foreign stocks did better still. Economic challenges don’t mean that stocks don’t provide positive returns.  The economic evidence shows that companies adapt to economic conditions, whether inflation, deflation, oil embargoes, or other shocks, and move on. 

 

In short, even if those predicting extended malaise are correct -- and we're not by any means saying they are! -- diversified portfolios can still provide attractive performance to patient investors.

 

Dave